The Five Waves of Tech: Riding the Tides of Technological Evolution

And the answer to what kind of tech companies should you join in 2025 if you want to 10x your career.

May 22, 2025

The technology industry has evolved through distinct waves, each characterized by revolutionary innovations that reshape how we live, work, and connect. Today, we stand at the precipice of a fifth wave – the AI revolution – that promises to be as transformative as its predecessors. Like ocean waves, each technological surge has carried some companies to new heights while leaving others behind. This pattern of creative destruction isn't random; it follows recognizable cycles that offer valuable insights for businesses and professionals navigating today's rapidly changing landscape.

The First Wave: Enterprise Computing (1950s-1970s)

The first wave of modern computing emerged in the aftermath of World War II, when room-sized machines began transforming how large organizations operated. This era was dominated by companies like IBM, Xerox, and AT&T, who built the foundations of enterprise computing.

IBM quickly established itself as the dominant player with its groundbreaking System/360 in 1965, the first series of upward compatible computers^[1]. This innovation, combined with widespread adoption of IBM software such as BATS (Basic Additional Teleprocessing Support) and database management systems, cemented IBM's position as the largest computer company of the era^[1-1]. Their systems became the backbone of operations for governments, financial institutions, and large corporations worldwide.

Xerox, founded in 1906 as the Haloid Photographic Company, revolutionized office work with the introduction of the Xerox 914 photocopier in 1959^[2]. The company later established the Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), which pioneered innovations like the graphical user interface and ethernet networking that would become crucial in the next wave. Meanwhile, AT&T's Bell Labs developed the UNIX operating system, which would eventually influence countless future systems.

During this period, computing was primarily confined to air-conditioned rooms where mainframes were operated by specialized technicians. The mainstream business world experienced computing through "green screen" terminal interfaces that offered limited functionality but represented a revolutionary step forward from manual processes^[3].

Key Innovations and Milestones

The first business use of computers came in 1952 when the J Lyons company in the UK implemented them for accounting functions^[1-2]. The U.S. Air Force's SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground Environment) air defense system in the early 1960s combined computers and networks for the first time, leading to commercial applications like American Airlines' SABRE reservation system in 1965^[1-3].

In this same era, Gordon Moore formulated his famous law predicting that the number of transistors per unit area of silicon would double approximately every two years, a principle that would drive technological advancement for decades to come^[1-4].

The Second Wave: Personal Computing (1980s-1990s)

The second wave brought computing power from institutional control to individual desks. This democratization was led by visionaries who saw the potential for computers to become personal tools rather than shared resources.

Microsoft, founded on April 4, 1975, by Bill Gates and Paul Allen in Albuquerque, New Mexico^[4], rose to prominence through a pivotal partnership with IBM in 1980. This agreement to bundle Microsoft's operating system with IBM computers provided Microsoft with a royalty for every sale^[4-1]. As personal computers proliferated, Microsoft Windows eventually captured over 90% of the world's personal computer market share in the 1990s^[4-2].

Apple's journey began on April 1, 1976, when Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne founded Apple Computer Company in Jobs's parents' home^[5]. The company's second computer, the Apple II, became a best-seller as one of the first mass-produced microcomputers^[5-1]. Though Apple would face struggles in the 1990s, its foundation during this period would eventually support a remarkable resurgence.

Intel, established on July 18, 1968, by Gordon Moore, Robert Noyce, and Arthur Rock^[6], became a crucial driver of PC evolution through its microprocessors. The "Wintel" partnership between Microsoft Windows and Intel in the early 1990s became instrumental in shaping the PC landscape^[6-1].

Surviving the Transition

Not all enterprise computing giants adapted successfully to the personal computing revolution. While IBM managed to pivot by developing the IBM PC and establishing itself in the new paradigm, companies like Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) struggled to transition from their minicomputer focus.

What differentiated survivors from casualties was their willingness to cannibalize existing business models in favor of emerging opportunities. IBM took the risky step of partnering with Microsoft and Intel rather than developing all components in-house, a decision that allowed it to quickly establish a presence in personal computing while maintaining its enterprise business.

This period also saw dramatic leadership stories, including Steve Jobs' forced departure from Apple in 1985 and eventual return in 1997 when the company was weeks away from bankruptcy^[5-2]. Such leadership dynamics would become a recurring theme in tech history.

The Third Wave: Web Computing (Post-2000 Crash)

The burst of the dot-com bubble in 2000 cleared the field for a new generation of companies built around the emerging web. This third wave saw the rise of platforms that would fundamentally change how we access information and conduct commerce.

Amazon, founded by Jeff Bezos on July 5, 1994, started as an online bookstore but had a much broader vision^[7]. Bezos initially incorporated the company as Cadabra, Inc., before changing the name months later because a lawyer misheard it as "cadaver"^[7-1]. Bezos selected "Amazon" because it was "exotic and different," just as he envisioned for his internet enterprise, and also because it would appear near the top of alphabetical listings^[7-2]. The company expanded from books to become "the everything store," developing subsidiaries including Amazon Web Services (cloud computing)^[7-3].

Google emerged from a Stanford University research project called "BackRub" started by Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 1995^[8]. They officially founded Google Inc. on September 4, 1998, in a garage in Menlo Park, California^[8-1]. The company's user-friendly interface and effective search algorithm quickly gained popularity, allowing it to expand into services like AdWords (2000), Google Images (2001), and Google News (2002)^[8-2].

Yahoo, once a dominant web portal, failed to adapt to changing user needs. Its approach to acquisitions was "fraught with mismanagement, poor execution, and failure to leverage its investments effectively"^[9]. A critical turning point came in 2008 when Yahoo rejected Microsoft's $44.6 billion buyout offer, a decision many analysts considered a missed opportunity^[9-1]. Yahoo also failed to invest in mobile technology as the internet transitioned from desktop to mobile, while competitors like Google and Facebook prioritized mobile-first strategies^[9-2].

Talent Wars Begin

During this period, acquiring top technical talent became increasingly competitive. In 2005, Google hired Internet pioneer Vinton Cerf, one of the creators of TCP/IP protocols, from MCI Inc^[10]. Google CEO Eric Schmidt described Cerf as "one of the most important people alive today," highlighting the strategic importance of such acquisitions^[10-1].

This wave also saw Microsoft and Google engaging in legal battles over talent. When Kai Fu-Lee resigned from Microsoft in July 2005 to oversee Google's efforts to open a research center in China, the two companies found themselves battling in court^[10-2]. These talent wars signaled the growing recognition that human capital was becoming as valuable as technological assets.

The Fourth Wave: App Economy (Post-2008 Crash)

As the world recovered from the 2008 financial crisis, a new wave of tech companies emerged, centered around mobile applications and social connectivity. This fourth wave coincided with the proliferation of smartphones and the creation of new digital social spaces.

Facebook (now Meta), established in 2004 as TheFacebook, Inc.^[11], expanded from a college networking site to become a global platform. Twitter, created by Jack Dorsey, Evan Williams, and Biz Stone in March 2006, launched publicly on July 15 of that year^[12]. The first Twitter message was published by Jack Dorsey on March 21, 2006, simply stating: "just setting up my twttr"^[12-1].

Dropbox, founded on June 1, 2007, by MIT students Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi^[13], represented a new category of cloud services aimed at individual users. The company grew rapidly, with its beta waiting list expanding from 5,000 to 75,000 people "literally overnight" after posting a demonstration video on Digg in March 2008^[13-1].

This wave was characterized by rapid user growth often preceding viable business models. Companies focused on building massive user bases before fully developing monetization strategies, a pattern that worked for some but led to sustainability challenges for others.

Mixed Fortunes

The fourth wave saw varied outcomes for established players. Amazon and Google successfully adapted their business models to embrace mobile and social trends. Amazon expanded into cloud services with AWS, while Google developed Android and acquired YouTube. Meanwhile, Yahoo continued to decline, struggling with frequent leadership changes and losing market relevance.

New entrants also experienced divergent paths. While Facebook grew into one of the world's most valuable companies, other platforms like Twitter and Snapchat faced challenges in converting user engagement into sustainable financial growth. Dropbox, despite early excitement, found itself competing in an increasingly commoditized storage market dominated by tech giants offering integrated services.

The Fifth Wave: Artificial Intelligence (Post-2022 Crash)

Today, we are witnessing the emergence of the fifth wave of technology centered around artificial intelligence. After the market correction of 2022, AI has moved from a research curiosity to the defining technological frontier, with specialized AI companies gaining unprecedented attention and investment.

OpenAI, founded in December 2015^[14], and Anthropic, established in 2021 by former OpenAI employees including siblings Daniela and Dario Amodei^[15], are leading this new paradigm. Unlike previous waves where hardware or platform innovations drove change, this wave is powered by increasingly sophisticated machine learning models that can generate content, understand language, and solve complex problems.

Anthropic has attracted substantial investment from established tech giants, with Amazon committing a total of $8 billion ($4 billion in 2023-2024 and another $4 billion announced in November 2024)^[15-1]. Google similarly invested $500 million in Anthropic in 2023 with a commitment for an additional $1.5 billion over time^[15-2]. These massive investments highlight how seriously established companies are taking the AI revolution.

Talent and Leadership Movements

The AI wave has triggered dramatic talent migrations. In 2024, Anthropic attracted several notable employees from OpenAI, including Jan Leike, John Schulman, and Durk Kingma^[15-3], indicating the intense competition for AI expertise. Most recently, former Apple design chief Jony Ive announced he would join OpenAI in a groundbreaking move that signals AI's expansion beyond pure technology into product design^[16].

This partnership between Ive and OpenAI aims to "reimagine what it means to use a computer," with plans to unveil collaborative projects in 2026^[16-1]. The merger between OpenAI and Ive's technology enterprise, io, is reportedly valued at approximately $6.5 billion^[16-2], demonstrating the extraordinary valuations being assigned to AI innovation.

Meanwhile, established tech giants are positioning themselves differently in this new landscape. Microsoft has embraced the AI revolution through extensive partnerships with OpenAI, while Google has developed its own AI systems while also investing in Anthropic. Apple appears to be moving more cautiously, still heavily focused on its hardware ecosystem and App Store revenue model rather than leading in AI development.

Patterns Across the Waves

Looking across these five waves of technological evolution, several consistent patterns emerge that help explain why some companies thrive while others falter when paradigms shift.

Revenue and Valuation Dynamics

Each wave follows a predictable economic pattern: established companies from previous waves maintain strong revenue and market dominance initially, while newcomers grow rapidly but often without immediate profitability. During the enterprise computing era, IBM dominated revenues while early PC companies struggled for viability. Similarly, today's AI companies are securing massive valuations and investments despite uncertain short-term profitability, while established tech giants continue to generate the bulk of industry revenue.

This creates a dual economy within the tech sector, where different metrics apply to different generations of companies. Established players are judged on current performance, while emerging companies are valued on potential for disruption and future growth. The challenge for investors and talent alike is determining when the growth trajectory of newer companies will intersect with the plateauing curves of established players.

Talent Migration

A reliable indicator of where innovation is heading is the movement of top technical talent. From the brain drain of researchers leaving Xerox PARC to join Apple in the early PC era, to Google hiring Internet pioneer Vinton Cerf in 2005^[10-3], to Anthropic attracting key OpenAI researchers in 2024^[15-4], talent flows signal shifting centers of innovation.

These migrations happen before market dominance is established, creating a leading indicator for industry direction. Companies that can attract and retain exceptional talent during wave transitions gain significant advantages in the next era. This talent arbitrage often involves researchers and engineers leaving comfortable positions at established companies to join riskier but potentially more impactful ventures.

The Innovation Timeline

A consistent pattern across waves is the approximately five-year gap between technological breakthroughs and their commercial maturation. The foundations of web commerce were laid years before Amazon became profitable; social media platforms existed for years before developing sustainable business models; and today's AI systems represent the culmination of research that began long before their current commercial applications.

This lag creates both opportunity and risk. Early adopters of emerging technologies can establish market position before business metrics catch up with innovation, but they also face the challenge of sustaining investment through the commercialization valley. Companies that successfully navigate this period – maintaining both technological leadership and financial viability – emerge as the definitive leaders of each new wave.

Navigating the Current Wave

For professionals and companies navigating today's AI wave, historical patterns offer valuable guidance. We can expect established tech companies to maintain revenue leadership for the near term while AI-native companies grow at accelerated rates from smaller bases. Top talent will continue flowing toward AI innovators, even as established companies offer premium compensation to retain key personnel.

The career calculus follows familiar patterns. Joining established companies offers stability and competitive compensation, while the greatest potential for outsized career growth lies with companies defining the new paradigm. As with previous waves, the established players won't disappear overnight – IBM still exists and generates billions in revenue decades after its dominance peaked – but they may struggle to lead innovation in the new era.

What makes the AI wave potentially different is the magnitude of its impact. Where previous waves transformed how we work with computers, AI could transform the nature of work itself. This suggests that the disruption could be broader and deeper than previous transitions, affecting not just technology companies but every sector of the economy.

Conclusion: Will History Rhyme?

As Mark Twain allegedly said, "History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes." The five waves of technology evolution show consistent patterns of creative destruction, talent migration, and value creation that offer a framework for understanding the current AI revolution.

What remains uncertain is whether AI represents merely the fifth wave in this sequence or something more fundamental – a technology that will reshape the patterns of innovation themselves. Will AI companies follow the trajectory of previous wave leaders, or are we witnessing something that transcends the established cycle?

What is clear is that we stand at an inflection point comparable to the birth of personal computing or the emergence of the commercial internet. For individuals and organizations alike, the decisions made during this transition will determine who rides the next wave and who gets left behind. As with previous waves, the greatest opportunities lie with those willing to embrace change rather than defend the status quo – even if that means disrupting their own success.

Thanks for reading system bashing! This post is public so feel free to share it.

system bashing